No sa proposal chosen fortigate 0238. Apr 6, 2013 · no ip http server. Now I had to to the same with an older FGT 80C which is behind NAT. 311 MET: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Jul 17, 2023 · IKE phase-1 negotiation is failed. Aug 7, 2024 · The following CLI debug commands need to be used on the responder VPN gateway to find the issue: diagnose vpn ike log-filter dst-addr4 x. Mar 2, 2018 · It still seems the proposal doesn't match. set transform-set esp-aes_256_esp-sha512-hmac 从Debug显示ike Negotiate IPsec SA Error: ike 0:VPN-to-SH:28:23: no SA proposal chosen，对比incoming proposal和my proposal可以看出IPSEC阶段二（ike Negotiate IPsec SA Error）没有匹配的加密算法。 In our previous post, we have already discussed the IPSec VPN Configuration in Fortigate Firewall. Can you share these command outputs with us? diagnose debug application ike -1 diagnose debug e Dec 12, 2011 · Yup - thats correct. We keep getting 'no proposal chosen' even though the settings are def the same. Mein Labor sah wie folgt aus: Die FRITZ!Box ist eine 7390 mit FRITZ!OS 06. set proposal aes256-sha512 Cisco. line aux 0. 解決策. Mismatched PFS: ignoring informational payload NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN, msgid=xxxxxx, length=12. I'm looking for a way to see what data is sent (maybe raw data) from pfSense to see why there's a size difference in the packet that's sent for the proposal depending on how the connection is initiated. 91:500,ifindex=5 Sep 9, 2013 · Foro NO OFICIAL de soporte en castellano de productos de Fortinet: Fortigate, Forticlient, Fortianalyzer, Fortimail, Fortibridge, Fortiguard, ike Negotiate IPsec SA Error: ike 0:ipsec:556:504137: no SA proposal chosen A mismatch that was found in Phase 2: After reviewing the debugs, the mismatch occurring in phase 2 is the DH group and AES Encryption. conf - strongSwan IPsec configuration file config setup uniqueids = yes # VPN 1 conn fgt_vpn auto = add keyexchange = ikev2 mobike = no type = tunnel forceencaps = no left = %%any 11[IKE] no IKE config for 198. Mar 18, 2015 · @Speed831:. While this worked like out of the bo Apr 25, 2024 · The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. line vty 0 4! end. 103:500->187. 1[500]-200. 0 build 247 dated 04/17/06, fg60wf on 3. x. You should post IKE phase 1 and phase2 from each fortigate. Sep 10, 2023 · If I try it using the dynamic DNS FQDN of the 60E, I get "no SA proposal chosen" and it fails. The router forwards all traffic to a DMZ-IP, what in this case is the Fortigate50E. 31. 0 255. Fortinet side is policy based vpn tunnel. The code is different (6. Hoping someone may be able to advise. 0Mr1) <> Windows 2012 r2 (AWS EC2) with tunnel setup using Windows Firewall (using connection rules) I get the following, not sure is it phase1 or phase 2 errors, this "malformed message" is quit Jul 13, 2021 · 问题描述使用VPN网关的IPsec-VPN功能建立专有网络VPC到本地数据中心的VPN连接时，在配置完成后，IPsec连接状态显示为“第二阶段协商未成功”。 No proposal chosen usually means a mismatch in the ike cryto settings. Phase 1 and 2 on both units are set to AES256CBC, SHA256, DH14, lifetime 28,800. Otherwise it will result in a phase 1 negotiation failure. It is possible to see the proposals are not matching, causing the phase2 negotiation to fail. stopbits 1. Apr 25, 2024 · Nominate a Forum Post for Knowledge Article Creation. 0 build 8074 dated 04/18/06. DDNS is set up and a hostname is created and working. Debug on the FGT are showing phase 1 is authenticating correctly, but the 881's are sending back "notify msg received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN"I'm meeting with the provider to do ike 0:pfsense: ignoring IKE request, no policy configured As u/jimmyt234 mentioned, it does not look like you have a firewall rule referencing the vpn interface. FortiClient側のVPN詳細設定にて、フェーズ1およびフェーズ2のIKEプロポーザルを AESxxx から DES に変更すると、VPN通信が確立できるようになります。 Aug 17, 2021 · Hey all, Right now im trying to establish a site to site IPsec between a Cisco 2900 Router and a FortiGate 40F Firewall. 4 build1803 (GA), the Sep 5, 2023 · If I try it using the dynamic DNS FQDN of the 60E, I get "no SA proposal chosen" and it fails. It appears you can't add a dial-up IPSec tunnel to an aggregate - set type dynamic and set aggregate enable appear to be mutually exclusive - so I want to get it working using dynamic DNS. Checked: pre-shared key on both sides; presence of st0 interface in "vpn" part of ipsec. Solution While troubleshooting the tunnel down issue, apply the below commands to take the debugs on both FortiGate: di vpn ike log-filter clear di vpn ike log-filter &lt;att name&gt; &lt;att value&gt; diag Aug 17, 2021 · Hey all, Right now im trying to establish a site to site IPsec between a Cisco 2900 Router and a FortiGate 40F Firewall. from MikroTik side -> failed to pre-process ph2 packet. 163. Mar 23, 2015 · Greetings! I've recently come across a strange issue with two different Fortigate-boxes, both running 5. Mar 12, 2019 · Hi all, Bit of a strange one. [ SA KE No ID V V V V V Apr 9, 2018 · Hi - I only see port 500 hitting the firewall I am trying to connect to. no suitable proposal found in peer's SA payload. 0,build3608 (GA Patch 7)) the other end is a livebox pro (from france), which is emulating a cisco router set proposal aes128gcm set dhgrp 21 set keepalive enable set keylifeseconds 28800 End Destination Config FortiGate-Destination # show vpn ipsec phase1-interface config vpn ipsec phase1-interface edit "ToSource" set interface "wan1" set ike-version 2 set keylife 28800 set peertype any set net-device disable set proposal aes128gcm-prfsha384 set Mar 14, 2006 · are you using a licenced version of forticlient? phase 1 and phase 2 must be similar at the client and the fortigate. Apr 14, 2020 · Trying to troubleshoot an IPSec/IKEv1 VPN connection with Strongswan that is failing to complete phase 2 with NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN. See full list on infosecmonkey. I was pretty sure for a while that configuring the local id on both ends would fix it. Without a match and proposal agreement, Phase 1 can never establish. Debug IKE (level -1) will report “no SA proposal chosen” even if all the proposals are properly configured Mar 27, 2017 · the same Diffie-Hellman group the same proposal (aes256 - sha512) the same keylife (in seconds) Phase_2. 2, there is no issue at all even though all three Description: This article describes that tunnel fails to come up with 'Peer SA proposal not match local policy' message in logs. Feb 22, 2024 · Nominate a Forum Post for Knowledge Article Creation. This is the log FORTIGATE60D_QUERETARO # ike 0: comes 189. Incoming proposal has val=PRF_HMAC_SHA and HPE-Test proposal has val=PRF_HMAC_SHA2_256. aaa authentication ppp default local!! aaa session-id common. 1. May 27, 2024 · Both incoming and expected proposals matched (apparently) and yet I was getting "negotiation failure, no SA proposal chosen" which led me to create new certificates (once again) because I wanted to see if it was a factor (it turns out it isn't) and this led me to create another connection wich in fact, worked out of the blue. (SA_NO PROPOSAL CHOSEN. 200. Individual crypto profiles are set for each of our five VPNs. X. 30, während die Fortinet Firewall eine FortiWiFi 90D mit Version 5. Apr 2, 2019 · peer SA proposal not match local policy このエラーで接続できないのではまりました。 これをカスタムではなく、Site to Siteでやってから、カスタムに変えるとうまくいきました。 相手先のIPアドレスを間違えないように、事前認証鍵も正確に。 Aug 26, 2006 · Nominate a Forum Post for Knowledge Article Creation. 非アクティブなikeフェーズ2によって引き起こされた問題に関連するvpnステータスメッセージを確認および分析します。 May 1, 2002 · Description. It is also possible to use the CLI: config vpn ipsec phase2-interface (phase2-interface) # edit test Site1 says Negotiate ISAKMP SA Error: ike no SA proposal chosen Site2 says phase 1 in progress (never says fail) Both sides were 50e's, but I replaced site2 with a 60e, I didn't think there was that much difference. it just keeps failing. I see in this kb that for the pulse client you should create a custom proposal instead of the standard one you have. 11 Firmware Version: 5. logging synchronous. Because the eval license doesn't support all encryption algorithms. --> Where x. Other Side is still a 100E with 6. Oct 30, 2017 · Ensure that both ends use the same P1 and P2 proposal settings (seeThe SA proposals do not match (SA proposal mismatch). I read that it could be IPSec crypto settings or proxy ID that don't match. Check phase 1 settings such as. 0 mr1. Symptoms. Jan 29, 2020 · 2020/01/28 01:20:42 info vpn Primary-Tunnel ike-nego-p2-proposal-bad 0 IKE phase-2 negotiation failed when processing SA payload. Redirecting to /document/fortigate/6. Jul 25, 2014 · I'm trying to configure an IPSec VPN on a Fortigate 80C and connect to it using Shrew Soft VPN. Now that I've had time to think, I'm pretty damn sure the issue is #2 above so I need to find somebody who can change the Azure config to some other than DH group 24. 7-2o no proposal chosen ike Negotiate SA Error: ike ike [6633] Nov 22, 2021 · To elaborate a little on what @bojanzajc6669 has said …. 11 on the 50e vs 6. I'm configuring a new Ikev2 site-to-site VPN on a Cisco 2921 to a customer/3rd party Cisco ASA, we're running both Ikev1 + Ikev2 vpns on here at the moment. Sniffer output: peer SA proposal not match local policy ' I seem to have this issue regardless of who or what I'm connecting to but in this situation its our internal 200F >< our internal 100F. Feb 1, 2015 · "ignoring ike request, no policy configured" usually suggests firewall policy missing for Virtual IPSEC interface. 6; LAN A -> 10. 4. DDNS itself works fine on my FGT and resolves correctly. Peer A -> 27. 178. Nominating a forum post submits a request to create a new Knowledge Article based on the forum post topic. Jun 14, 2019 · Hi, I am trying to set up a ipsec site to site VPN between two Fortigate devices: The branch unit is connected to the ISP router which gets a dynamic IP-address. But it just won't connect (cannot be brought up). 2 ist. below). X:LAN Sep 8, 2023 · If I try it using the dynamic DNS FQDN of the 60E, I get "no SA proposal chosen" and it fails. ip cef. 20. The same Diffie-Hellman group ("dhgrp" parameter on Fortigate and "pfs" parameter on Cisco) The same keylife (in kilobytes) Proposals are: Fortigate. Scope: FortiGate. no ip domain lookup. Scope FortiGate, IPsec. 40. 0, the Local-in-Policy can now be also configured in the GUI. Mar 14, 2025 · The latter ('no SA proposal chosen') is usually due to a mismatch in the phase 1 configuration such as IKE mode (Aggressive/Main) and Encryption/Authentication algorithms. Jun 18, 2024 · FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high performance, including encrypted traffic. 100. LAN to LAN Virtual Private Network (VPN) Preshared IKE VPN Debug was performed on responder Traffic initiated from the other side of the VPN tunnel No proposal chosen NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN VPN not working Debug ike basic message: Jan 3, 2025 · Note: Starting from FortiGate v7. X>200F><100F<172. I'm stuck with a negotiation failure, even though debugging on the Fortigate unit shows the same values for both proposals, except for the proposal id : sending notification NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN to VPN_PUBLIC_IP:500. 65, Information Exchange processing failed IP = x. 0,build3608 (GA Patch 7)) the other end is a livebox pro (from france), which is emulating a cisco router Oct 5, 2015 · When using Aggressive Mode for establishing a VPN connection, any mismatch in the IKE parameters will cause an immediate negotiation failure. tried to set up both policy-based and route-based vpns, but the problem in logs was the same: No proposal chosen. 12) does not have this as an available option in the phase 1 setup. Proxy ID mismatch : The below Proxy ID mismatch log can be seen only when PA firewall is the Responder of the Phase 1 Debug log : Nov 13, 2024 · msr3020路由器提示no proposal is chosen-Payload=PROPOSAL,IKE packet dropped，问题出在哪里 2024-11-13 Mar 21, 2025 · The reason is w hen the FortiGate receives an SA_INIT message, there is no peer ID available for FortiGate to immediately identify the correct tunnel (B_NAT-T). 75. パターン ④ Dec 5, 2016 · Hello I have two fortigate units 60D with a VPN Site to Site between them, i used the fortinet template for build the VPN. Nov 2, 2017 · Fortigate 60D Sonicewall TZ100. conf files for both VMs. And then P2 proposal fails due to timeout. fg400 is 3. ike Negotiate SA Error: ike ike [1470] Solution: Verify PFS in phase-2 configuration from both sides and make sure that the DH group on phase-2 is identical. IKE Negotiation Fails: Phase 1 SA Not Acceptable, No Proposal Chosen . When the tunnel is up, I see the parameters used and they match what I have configured in pfSense and the ASA. Please make sure the remote box is using the same or compatible proposal with your local Fortigate. tried different permutations of those setting. Please create a firewall rule fro your source interface to the destination interface "pfsense" and see if that allows the VPN to come up. I have tried with peer id definition on both firewalls, and also with the option of "any id" on both firewalls. Sep 20, 2023 · This article explains the ikev2 debug output in FortiGate. Ensure that you have allowed inbound and outbound traffic for all necessary network services, especially if services such as DNS or DHCP are having problems. After correcting this by selecting the right remote gateway on one of the FortiGates, the tunnel comes up as expected, provided all Today we determined that even though the Parameters and Phase 1 Proposals match, the Fortigate will not choose a Proposal and fails. Apr 25, 2024 · Hello , Do you have a valid license on both sides? If you use a eval license you need to create vpn with lower encryption keys. 65, Received an un-encrypted NO_PROPOSAL /r/guitars is a place for people to post pictures of and discuss everything about guitars i. anyway, i can' t even get the vpn past phase1 i' ve checked and rechecked the se Apr 25, 2024 · Nominate a Forum Post for Knowledge Article Creation. In my case the problem is that the other side does nothave a static public ip so I have to use ddns. D. 0 next end. If FortiGate selects a tunnel where NAT traversal is disabled (A_No-NAT-T), the NAT_DETECTION will be ignored, and the SA_INIT packet from the responder will not include NAT-T. FortiGate 60B firewall to establish VPN connections for remote access to corporate network no keystate in ISAKMP SA 00B57C50 . 150. 5. Debug on Cisco: 000087: *Aug 17 17:04:36. like different encr/auth settings, different DH/PFS settings. Below are my ipsec. To resolve the issue, make sure the IKE mode and Phase 1 Proposal match on both sides. i'm currently on fortigate VM-64 (Firmware Versionv5. We've tried the same setup on FortiClient (IPSEC, PSK, DH Group 5, Main and Aggressive Mode,Key Lifetime Matches), with the same result. Ich hatte ja nichts anderes behauptet, sondern gesagt: schließe damit eine Fehlerseite aus ;) Bislang war der Fehler meistens nicht auf pfSense sondern auf der anderen Seiten zu suchen. It seems like the newly configured VPN isn't using the configured ikev Feb 21, 2018 · Mit Listen-only zickt der Tunnel ebenfalls rum. 1/24 バージョン FortiGate for VMware FortiOS v7. Jan 17, 2018 · どこのご家庭にもある一般的な Fortigate 100E で Azure と VPN の接続検証をしてみたので、個人的なメモとして残しておきます。 各種ドキュメント サイト間 VPN ゲートウェイ接続用の VPN デバイスと IPsec/IKE パラメーターについて It looks like you have one side set to SHA1 and the HPE-Test to SHA256. 4) conn %default lifetime=60m mobike=no May 23, 2012 · VPN S2S Fortigate vs CISCO received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN. Also post a successful IKE messages. ip source-route. received and ignored notification payload: NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN Aug 26, 2020 · Administrators should know that FortiGate will not successfully negotiate the IKE traffic to avoid later troubleshooting issues as FortiGate needs to allow the users' traffic later. If it happens that the WAN interface for the VPN connection has a secondary IP address and the secondary IP is used to connect to the VPN, it is necessary to configure the secondary IP as a local gateway for the VPN. 6. 0. We are using below topology to troubleshoot the FortiGate VPN IPSec tunnel issues. Here in this post we will understand how to trouble shoot the FortiGate VPN tunnel IKE failures. One end either has to change the proposal or add a second proposal that matches. 51. Refer to this document for reference: Technical Tip: Creating a Local-In policy (IPv4 and IPv6) on GUI. 255. Sep 29, 2022 · Hi I am trying to setup site-to-site vpn tunneling on AWS VMs. You might want to cross check firewall policies on Fortigate, there should be following two polices configured: 1>IPSEC virtual interface -> Internal interface (Where network for which traffic is to be send over VPN is connected). Apr 27, 2021 · I created a VPN Tunnel called "MY_VPN" to connect VPN Ipsec to Site2. Due to negotiation timeout. 10. e. Make sure there is no session entry in the session table for remote IP with destination port number 500 after local-in-policy has been configured: Oct 5, 2023 · Based on the above debug, FortiGate does not receive any proposal, the negotiation fails, and the SA is not chosen. This morning the Fortigate in branch was rebooted but the VPN not. Jul 19, 2019 · The SA proposals do not match (SA proposal mismatch) The most common problem with IPsec VPN tunnels is a mismatch between the proposals offered between each party. no ip http secure-server! access-list 101 permit ip any any!!! line con 0. 1, sending NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN Falsche ID Initiator Stimmt die konfigurierte Remote ID nicht mit der ID überein, die der Initiator meldet, dann kann auch hier der Verbindungsversuch nicht zugeordnet werden und dies wird im Responder-Log dokumentiert. received unauthenticated v2N_NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN - ignored. but no. パターン ③ (赤枠の部分) イベント: ike-nego-p2-proposal-bad 内容: IKE phase-2 negotiation failed when processing SA payload. On a third box, also running 5. LAN:172. Hola, NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN" config vpn ipsec phase1-interface Mar 7, 2021 · Hi, I'm trying to connect Mikrotik with Fortigate using Gre over Ipsec but I'm stuck already on Ipsec Phase 1 exchange, maybe could anyone help me? Fortigate config: config vpn ipsec phase1-interface edit "ipsec_p1" set interface "port16" set ike-version 2 set local-gw F Apr 13, 2020 · 问 ikev1第二阶段no_proposal_chosen失败，但esp方案是正确的。 还有什么能让这一切失败呢？ Apr 22, 2021 · set proposal aes256-sha256 set dhgrp 14 set keepalive enable set keylifeseconds 28800 set src-subnet 10. 11 on the 60e) I made sure that both had the same proposals: Site1 Sep 2, 2015 · When the FortiGate is configured to terminate IPsec VPN tunnel on a secondary IP, the local-gw must be configured in the IKE phase 1. The evaluation version of the client doesn' t support 3DES or AES, only DES the hashing must me the same, if the fgt is configured with sha-1, so should the client. On both of these, I am unable to connect the built-in client on iOS to the iOS Wizard-created IPSec VPN's. It pretty much just tells me that "no proposal chosen". 184. ignoring unauthenticated notify payload (NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN) packet lacks expected payload . Aug 24, 2006 · fg60wifi and fg400, both on their version of 3. . 254[500] message id:0xB6857AE9. 9. x is the IP address of the initiator. 16. 不一致のPFS: ignoring informational payload NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN, msgid=xxxxxx, length=12. 5. VM-1 (assume IP address : 1. Feb 3, 2015 · Hi guys, I hope you will be able to point my head to the resolution for the following: Env: FG 80C (4. 75198. both p1 are set to main/preshared/3des+sha1 and 3des+md5, even thing else default. Firmware Version: 5. com Jul 14, 2017 · no SA proposal chosen means that the security association doesn't match on both sides. Mar 31, 2023 · ike 4:test-P1:18317:test-P2:228618: no proposal chosen . Aug 24, 2017 · Hi, I keep having issues with my IPSec sts VPN. failed to add connection: ESP DH algorithm 'modp1024' is not supported. Proxy IDs are OK because when I put non-existing network, I don't Jul 25, 2023 · The log message "Received notify: No_Proposal_Chosen" indicates there is a mismatch of proposals during phase 1 or phase 2 negotiation between a site-to-si Partner portal Promotions Mar 2, 2018 · hello, i have a problem with a site-to-site VPN. from FortiGate side -> NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN/no matching Sep 8, 2023 · I also had issues with ipsec and ddns. Strongswan Config: #/etc/ipsec. 311 MET: IKEv2-ERROR:Couldn't find matching SA: Mar 2, 2018 · hello, i have a problem with a site-to-site VPN. Aug 3, 2021 · Failed SA: 200. After a period of IPSEC tunnel being succesfully up and working beteen Azure VPN Gateway and Fortigate 200 E firewall running FortiOS v6. 5 days ago · FortiGate A is the receiver in this case, does not accept the proposals but responds with the error: 'no proposal chosenNegotiate SA Error: [11895]'. had a lot of hours spent but no result. Always have a No proposal chosen message on the Phase 2 proposal. Dec 26, 2024 · FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high performance, including encrypted traffic. It was noted in this case that the FortiGate which was upgraded added a new phase2 object, making the phase2 go down. Apr 18, 2012 · We had a working IPSec connection with another location. exec-timeout 0 0. electric, acoustic, lap, steel, bass, amps, pedals, strings, picks, etc. Mensaje por dcrosio » 31 Jul 2017, 21:56. On the log (diag debug app ike -1 , diag debug enable ) it said "ignoring IKEv2 request, no policy configured" which I've clearly created on "Policy & Objects" -> "Security Policy" (there is no "Ipv4 Policy" menu on my Fortigate). 5 « NO PROPOSAL CHOSEN Jan 3, 2021 · I am documenting this for posterity. Seems that the only DH group in the proposal from Azure is 24, but my FortiGate (running 7. Maybe a keylife time in one side is 86400 and in the other side is 86400. I tried to FortiGate connection wizard, I also tried a custom setup and went through the proposals which all matched. Authentication method; IKE version; Encryption; Authenticatioin; DH Group Also look for other settings that may be mismatched. The following is the example debug and sniffer output when there is no IPv4 policy configured on FortiGate (2. received and ignored notification payload: NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN Mar 14, 2006 · Nominate a Forum Post for Knowledge Article Creation. Jul 18, 2023 · IKE phase-1 negotiation is failed. 2. 38; Peer B -> 83. 비활성 IKE(Internet Key Exchange) 2단계로 인한 문제와 관련된 VPN 상태 메시지를 검토하고 분석합니다. 67. Wie im Internet üblich ist die FortiGate mit einer statischen IP-Adresse versehen (obgleich 1 zu 1 geNATet), während sich die FRITZ!Box hinter einer dynamischen IP verbirgt. This example illustrates a failure due to the &#34;OAKLEY_GROUP&#34; parameters which is also known as MODP Diffie-Hellman group: ike 0:224b50f8ebe84df6/00000 「configured」が定義済のポリシーを、「created」が実際に生成したSAを示しています。 なお、IPsec SAはポリシー毎に「送信方向(outbound)のSA」と「受信方向(inbound)のSA」を1つずつ持ちますので、正しくIPsec接続ができていると「created」は「configured」の2倍の数となります。 Dec 30, 2022 · Hello Community, Dears, I have an issue in setup FortiGate MikroTik IPSec tunnel. システム ログに「no_proposal_chosen」が表示されて ipsec フェーズ 1 ネゴシエーションが失敗する - フェーズ 1 での暗号化の不一致 15716 Created On 07/27/22 22:09 PM - Last Modified 05/09/23 06:00 AM Feb 4, 2020 · hiho, I got a strange issue here: I set up IPSec between two FGT with 6. Jul 17, 2015 · Labor. 5 build0304 (GA) FortiClient 7. no ipv6 cef! multilink bundle-name authenticated Aug 29, 2024 · ike Negotiate IPsec SA Error: ike 0:TEST:20877815:12518468: no SA proposal chosen . 3. x and one side behind NAT (LTE Box) with success using fortiddns as remote gw. Trying to establish s2s vpn tunnel, using IKEv2. The FortiGate GUI shows that the Tunnel is UP, but on the Cisco it's still not working. 16/cookbook. I did run all the debug commands, and looks like the "timeout" message is more a symptom of a "stuck in Phase 1" problem. Please ensure your nomination includes a solution within the reply. Mar 25, 2025 · received unauthenticated v2N_NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN - ignored. They don't match, so "no proposal chosen" They have to match. 210. At the moment using "standard" proposal-sets both in IKE in IPSEC policies. Basically anything with strings. is used as an example remote IP). Solution: The VPN configuration is identical on both local and remote ends but the VPN still fails to come up and negotiation errors are seen in the logs. On our end, we replaced an old Pix 515 with a new ASA 5520 and since then, the tunnel will not come up with the following in the log: IP = x. rcjyw zfkj nwmxd twuckn ydxlaca qplyq tlmy xosbk hzbmcnhw kfzc nsdyn qrilglp dtqu myfih xrbkpcc